0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£´ëÇлýÀÇ ÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ½ºÆ®·¹½º, ¿ì¿ï ¹× ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨ ºñ±³¿¬±¸: Type D ¼º°Ý±º°ú non-Type D ¼º°Ý±ºÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

Comparisons of Clinical Practicum Stress, Depression, and Self-Efficacy among Nursing Students: Focusing on Type D Personality and non-Type D Personality

Á¤½Å°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 26±Ç 3È£ p.217 ~ 225
KMID : 0607320170260030217
¼º¹ÌÇö ( Seong Mi-Hyeon ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀϹݴëÇпø

±è¿Á¼± ( Kim Ok-Sun ) - °æº¹´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
Á¤¿¬¿Á ( Jeoung Yeon-Ok ) - °æµ¿´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¼®¼ÒÇö ( Sok So-Hyune ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of study was to examine and compare the clinical practicum stress, depression, and self-efficacy between Type D and non-Type D personality among nursing students.

Methods: This study used a descriptive correlational survey design. Subjects included a total of 120 nursing students (Type D personality: n=60, non-Type D personality: n=60) in Seoul, Korea. The collected data were analyzed using a descriptive statistics, ¥ö2 test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, ANCOVA, and Scheffe test as a post hoc test with SPSS/WIN 21.0 program.

Result: There were significant differences on clinical practicum stress (t=2.81, p=.029), depression (t=6.67, p<.001), and self-efficacy (t=9.84. p<.001) between non-Type D and Type D personality among nursing students.

Conclusion: Type D personality in nursing students had higher clinical practicum stress and depression than them of non-Type D personality in nursing students. Nursing interventions or strategies for Type D personality in nursing students are needed to decrease clinical practicum stress and depression.
KeyWords
°£È£´ëÇлý, Type D ¼º°Ý, ÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ½ºÆ®·¹½º, ¿ì¿ï, ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨
Nursing student, Type D personality, Stress, Depression, Self-efficacy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed